Frequently asked questions

Founder materials stay inside a private workspace with controlled access, auditability, and clear organisational boundaries across intake, review, generation, and export. Each workspace is isolated at the database layer through row-level tenant isolation, so one client's decks, analyses, and generated outputs are not visible to another. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and uploads, reviews, and generated decks are handled under the controlled-handling and audit approach described on our security page. Where a consultant works on your behalf, that access follows the same role-based rules that govern the rest of the workspace. The report you receive within 24 hours is produced inside the same workspace your deck was uploaded to.

No. GoPresent makes fundraising work more systematic. It can stand alone for founder reviews or sit alongside existing advisory and investor workflows. The platform complements the people already helping you rather than replacing them: a gap analysis gives an advisor a structured starting point — a 0-100 Capital Readiness Score across 10 investor dimensions — instead of a first read from scratch. Consultants can also run GoPresent on behalf of their clients: uploading materials, running analyses, and preparing the workspace so the founder logs in to work that is already organised. In practice, advisors use the findings to focus their sessions on the gaps that matter most, while the founder uses the platform between meetings to practise investor Q&A and iterate on the deck.

Yes. Angels, family offices, and VC teams use GoPresent to standardise intake, compare opportunities on a consistent standard, and move higher-conviction deals forward faster. Instead of every deal arriving as a differently structured deck, each one comes through the same intake and is scored on the same standard, so opportunities across a pipeline can be compared like-for-like. A Quick Screen takes a company URL and returns maturity signals, risk flags, and a verdict in 2-5 minutes, with one free screen per month to start. Fuller reports produce IC-ready summaries — structured findings a team can circulate to an investment committee without rewriting the analysis — with risk broken down across team, market, product, financials, and competitive landscape. For funds, up to 5 team members can work from the same pipeline with role-based access.

We currently support PDF pitch decks up to 10 MB. Upload your deck and we extract the content for analysis, scoring, and deck generation. That single extraction feeds the whole workflow: the same content drives your Capital Readiness Score, the gap analysis across 10 investor dimensions, and — on Raise Ready — the AI-revised deck, so there is no need to re-submit materials at each stage. If your deck lives in another tool, export it to PDF before uploading; the analysis works from the text of your slides. At upload you can also add context about your raise — stage, target amount, and key metrics — which sharpens the findings, and results arrive within 24 hours.

Fast enough for live fundraising. The goal is to get founders and teams from a raw deck to a useful gap analysis in one focused session. Your free investor report — including your Capital Readiness Score and top gaps — arrives within 24 hours of upload. Behind that turnaround is a multi-agent AI review: six specialist agents score the deck across 10 investor dimensions, from problem framing and market sizing through to team credibility and the financial story. That means you can upload a raw deck, read the findings, and act on the prioritised fixes before your next investor meeting rather than after it. Re-analysis after you revise the deck works the same way, so the score you track over time always reflects your latest version.

White-label and higher-touch workflow support are handled selectively. If that is the need, the right next step is a conversation so we can scope the operating model properly. The standard Scout offering already covers much of what funds and accelerators ask for — standardised intake, a consistent scoring standard across every deal, and team access for up to 5 members — so the conversation usually starts by checking whether the platform as it stands fits your workflow. Where it genuinely does not, arrangements are scoped case by case around how your team runs reviews, who needs access, and how reports are shared. Use the enquiry option on the pricing page to brief us and we will come back with a concrete proposal rather than a generic package.