For accelerators
Read every applicant the same way.
Every pitch claim checked against the evidence: a verdict, a deal score and an IC-ready memo draft in 2–5 minutes.
Pilot and paid deal flow is never used to train models.
Sample screen · Tallgrass Bio4 of 4 pages readVerdict: WatchDeal score 64/100, ModerateIllustrative sample
| What the company says | State | What the evidence shows |
|---|---|---|
| “US company, incorporated in 2021” | Supported | Delaware · Incorporated March 2021 · Active· US company filings |
| “26 paying customers” | Contradicted | Its own archived customers page names 4 pilots, none paying· Company website, archived |
| “40% month-on-month growth” | Unverifiable | Self-reported in the deck. No independent source found. |
| Gross margin | Missing | Not in the deck. Ask the founder for gross margin by customer. |
Unverifiable is not false.2 of 4 claims in this sample were unverifiable or missing.
Illustrative example. Tallgrass Bio is a fictional company; the figures show what a report looks like, not a real result.
The case
Why teams like yours screen with GoPresent.
- Who this is for
- Accelerators and venture studios reviewing cohorts of applicants.
- The problem
- Application volume spikes around every intake, and reviewers apply different standards to the same evidence.
- How GoPresent helps
- GoPresent checks each applicant’s claims against the evidence and returns a verdict, a deal score and an IC-ready memo draft, so every application is read the same way.
What changes
What you get from the first screen.
- One standard across every applicant and reviewer
- Unverified claims flagged before the interview
- Selection memos your committee can compare side by side
Also built for
The same standard, for other teams.
VC funds
Screen inbound deals to one standard.
For VC fundsFamily offices
Check direct deals against the evidence.
For family offices